As the Xbox community awaits the completion of the largest deal in video game history, which is now under scrutiny by the European Competition Authority, one of the Authority's employees appears to provoke the community and raise their concerns about the success of the deal.

It all started when Ricardo Cardoso, an employee of the European Competition Authority, published Tweet He carried many indications of distrust and anger from the Xbox community about the authority's scrutiny process of the deal, as he said in his tweet that they are working hard to ensure the continued release of the Call of Duty game on all platforms, including PlayStation.

The committee is working to ensure that you can still play Call of Duty on other consoles (including the PlayStation Hakki).

This statement angered many members of the Xbox and Microsoft communities, who began expressing concern about the objectives of the committee tasked with studying the implications of the agreement. These statements clearly indicate that this agreement will not be approved until Call of Duty arrives on PlayStation.

Cardoso reiterated that, although he is a Commission employee, he is not a member of the committee responsible for examining the consequences of Microsoft's acquisition of Activision, and that this tweet merely reflects his private opinion. However, this did not prevent widespread controversy and a major attack from the Xbox community, both through his own account and on video game forums.

famous influencer Brad Samswhich is one of the new sources of support for the Xbox brand, and Microsoft has released a new video in which it talks about the true intentions that the European Competition Authority is hiding regarding the deal and its supportive position, which has now become clear through these direct contacts and statements from one of its employees, as he described.

Of course, Cardoso's tweet came in response to resolution The committee will transfer the flour in the acquisition agreement to the in-depth investigation stage.

Do you think this employee's statements indicate the committee's intentions and tendencies to avoid PlayStation, or is it just an opinion that came at the wrong time?